sweden

THE VAST complexity of media – the spin, the funded agendas, the sheer weight of information, the overwhelming choice of platforms and outlets,  suggests that simple messages are not being fed to us  – but they are.

The lesson the public is being fed about Sweden’s approach to coronavirus is clear  – libertarian individualism, laissez-faire economics, social darwinism – however you wish to define or categorise free market ideology – is the answer to our killer virus and Sweden proves it. Sweden isn’t bothering with a semi legally imposed lockdown and it is being that celebrated that a nonsense-free approach is working.

New Zealand’s approach to the coronavirus, on the other hand,  is not being presented with the same emotional pride in our mainstream media. Yet, the statistics available, show that it is more successful in preserving the population and its economy than Sweden. New Zealand isn’t the great example of apparently successful social darwinism, or it can’t be exaggerated to be perceived that way, so it isn’t getting the same media attention.

The populism used to promote the Swedish story provides the same easy attraction as the consumer ideal of pleasure and social irresponsibility.   It provides an alternative to the fuddy duddy, do gooder notion of being the official party pooper of life-saving, lockdown.

In UK culture, the message carried in the Swedish spin, the impression that it makes, its suggestiveness, is that we may as well have carried on going to the pub and getting pissed anyway in spite of coronavirus. This message connects deeply with the mass babyneeds provided by consumer entertainment products – self serving, hedonism and the instant gratification which sells products at a faster rate. It reenforces this view of reality pinned on right wing libertarian ideology.

In turn this also justifies the funds for  the lifestyles and identites of the media owners and their beneficiaries. Why let coronavirus, or climate change, or the truth get in the way of that. Free market wealth creation benefits us all – we are told. Even if most of us will never see it on our lifetimes no matter what we do, say or think.

The truth is that Swedish people are very different culturally to North Americans and the British populations having being brought up with a less intense form of capitalist permissiveness. They have been voluntarily keeping their children off school, more Swedish people live on their own and there is more social cohesion – or put another way Sweden is apparently dominated by a boring sensibleness of the better educated.

I watched this report on BBC’s Newsnight and it’s sensationalist to start with. It uses words like “subversive” and “dangerous” as a juicy and populist introduction of Sweden’s exciting, naughty cornovirus approach before breaking into more depth of analysis providing a further understanding. It was enlightening.

BBC newsnight on Sweden’s covid policy

It’s not a refreshing change from President Trump’s public speculation that Sweden’s crime and rape is caused by immigrants. You can only presume that having been presented with stats on a high amount of rape convictions in Sweden, the president overlooked the fact that the stats were based on Sweden’s highly strict definitions of rape or abuse and efficient prosecution of individuals accused in rape cases. Unusual even in the EU.

It’s not a refreshing change to hear Sweden elevated to a higher status in the UK instead of the consistent news stories on why it is not an ideal place to live. Not as good as you think it is, as if we all thought it was perfect and need to be ridiculed for it.

Suddenly praising Sweden for taking this more libertarian, coronavirus approach, presented as the most “common sense” least fussy approach, is totally predicatable. Now, instead of the normal criticism,  Sweden is praised as champions of libertarian ideals.

I guessed that when I put a Facebook post with a link to the Newsnight report on YouTube with the phrase “the truth is more interesting than the spin” that it was likely that nobody would bother to click on the link and watch the YouTube clip. It came as no suprise when a North American “friend” obssessed with the idea that lockdown is a Stalinist infringement of personal rights – took up the wrong end of the stick to again praise Sweden for saving its economy with an enthusastic comment underneath.

Sweden hasn’t saved its economy from the impact of COVID-19.

sweden’s economy still taking the hit – cnbc

That much was present in the detail of the juicy looking Newsnight report that my “friend” never bothered to watch. It was also present in the phrase – the truth is more interesting than spin. Only obvious to me, apparently, with my fuddy duddy, northern European dry intellectual approach to “fun” issues and love of social democracy.

But the real proof of why the whole spin on Sweden is nothing short of right wing propaganda and the promotion of right wing, political power bases through media ownership and ongoing populist threads of misinformation and lies, is not Taiwan, South Korea, Germany, Hong Kong, or the mass graves in New York. It’s New Zealand. It’s the facts.

New Zealand

new zealand

New Zealand’s lockdown and quarantine of people coming into New Zealand from mid March, mostly returning New Zealand residents, has limited the fatalties down to 19 in total. Now they are slowly reopening for business.

Sweden has around 241 deaths per million population compared to New Zealand’s approx 4 per million people. So can we conclude that the swift and widely accepted lockdown in New Zealand has saved lives while limiting damage to the economy?

Sweden’s economy has been hit just as badly as its neighbours anyway – a fact missed out of the headlines but available in the details of media reports.

The UK death rate per million of the population is 392 people. Higher than Germany and France. Much higher than Sweden or New Zealand. This is data compiled for 30th April by Statista:

“Statista is a German online portal for statistics, which makes data collected by market and opinion research institutes and data derived from the economic sector and official statistics available in English, French, German and Spanish.”
Based in Hamburg.

Check out COVID-19 deaths worldwide per one million population as of April 30, 2020, by country
Published by Raynor de Best, Apr 30, 2020
Based on a comparison of coronavirus deaths in over 160 countries relative to their population, Belgium had the most losses to COVID-19 up until April 30, 2020. As of the same date, the virus had infected over 3.1 million people worldwide, and the number of deaths had totaled more than 227,000.

Details below if anyone wants them…

“The difficulties of death figures
This table aims to provide a complete picture on the topic, but it very much relies on data that has become more difficult to compare. As the coronavirus pandemic developed across the world, countries already used different methods to count fatalities, and they sometimes changed them during the course of the pandemic. On April 16, for example, the Chinese city of Wuhan added a 50 percent increase in their death figures to account for community deaths. These deaths occurred outside of hospitals and went unaccounted for so far. The state of New York did something similar two days before, revising their figures with 3,700 new deaths as they started to include “assumed” coronavirus victims. The United Kingdom started counting deaths in care homes and private households on April 29, adjusting their number with about 5,000 new deaths. This makes an already difficult comparison even more difficult. Belgium, for example, counts suspected coronavirus deaths in their figures, whereas other countries have not done that (yet). This means two things. First, it could have a big impact on both current as well as future figures. On April 16 already, UK health experts stated that if their numbers were corrected for community deaths like in Wuhan, the UK number would change from 205 to “above 300”. This is exactly what happened two weeks later. Second, it is difficult to pinpoint exactly which countries already have “revised” numbers (like Belgium, Wuhan or New York) and which ones do not. One work-around could be to look at (freely accessible) timelines that track the reported daily increase of deaths in certain countries. Several of these are available on our platform, such as for Belgium, Italy, Spain and Sweden. A sudden large increase might be an indicator that the domestic sources changed their methodology.

Where are these numbers coming from?
The numbers shown here were collected by Johns Hopkins University, a source that manually checks the data with domestic health authorities. For the majority of countries, this is from national authorities. In some cases, like China, the United States, Canada or Australia, city reports or other various state authorities were consulted. In this statistic, these separately reported numbers were put together. For more information or other freely accessible content, please visit our dedicated Facts and Figures page.
Read more
Coronavirus (COVID-19) deaths worldwide per one million population as of April 30, 2020, by country